Safety in page numbers
Thursday, May 6th, 2010I’m a big fan of local newspapers. Some of you know I wrote for a local newspaper when I was living in West Virginia, and it was a very satisfying experience for me.
Accordingly, we subscribe to the local paper here. There is a twice-weekly paper that appears to be free (like The Valley Ranger!), and there is the one we pay for, a daily covering Joliet and its surrounds.
In a recent edition of the twice-weekly paper (sorry, y’all - bi-weekly has two meanings, and I think it is better fitted to mean “once every other week”), there’s a short sequence of stories about our new hometown, New Lenox. The stories, however, are not intended to be linked together. The headlines and brief commentary:
Page 3 - New Lenox named one of country’s safest towns
Yeah, that’s good news! Reminds us of Sinks Grove, sans neighbors shooting friends with sawed off shotguns. The article touts our town’s comprehensive efforts toward emergency response programs and the prevention of dangerous situations. Selection made by an international review committee through a process that originated in Sweden…cool.
Page 5 - New Lenox schools may cut bus transportation
Oh. That doesn’t sound too safe for the students. Maybe it’s a sign of the times.
Page 7 (with accompanying photo) - New Lenox playground burned
Holy Zeus! Marcy, pack the car - we’re going back to Sinks Grove!
Apparently no one was harmed, so I do not feel bad saying that this struck me as hilarious. Not only do you have this marvelous context set by the previous articles, but there’s a color photograph of the playground completely engulfed by orange and yellow flames.
At least the arsonist(s) had the decency to wait until the international review committee from Page 3 had already left.

